cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: request-response patterns.
Date Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:28:38 GMT
Hi,

I think its OK to use the Message Id pattern by default for the
interoperation
with the other SOAP/JMS implementation, if there is no correlation id is set
 on the JMSMessageHeader.

Willem

liucong wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Should I change to use Message ID Pattern and make it compatible with
> the specification?
> 
> 
> liucong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some information about JMS Correlation ID patten and Message ID pattern
>> on request-response patterns
>> (http://edocs.bea.com/alsb/docs25/interopjms/MsgIDPatternforJMS.html).
>>
>> By digging into the code about jms-transport, I know the current
>> jms-transport uses the Correlation ID Pattern. But the SOAP/JMS
>> specification uses Message ID Pattern.
>>
>> What should I do?
>> 1. To keep Correlation ID Pattern. But it is not compatible with the
>> specification.
>> 2. To use Message ID Pattern. I see some code which use spring-jms, I
>> can't get the id of the message which is sent by spring-jms. I don't
>> know how to get the message id which is used to correlated the response
>> message.
>>
>> Thank you for your sugguest in advance.
>>
>> liu
>>
>>   
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message