Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19391 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2009 16:57:05 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2009 16:57:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 23647 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2009 16:57:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 23594 invoked by uid 500); 5 Jun 2009 16:57:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 23584 invoked by uid 99); 5 Jun 2009 16:57:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:57:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.209 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.209] (HELO mail-ew0-f209.google.com) (209.85.219.209) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:57:07 +0000 Received: by ewy5 with SMTP id 5so3161353ewy.30 for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:56:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=MWCeDicAyuDROryersqMdrWFoBqv6Hu51fk4GcSt3xI=; b=KO1q1C0F6EnXc+1EVjBjpac1iP0qRfZjrm3qMVxIVLHtxiT47YS03XRbrKRupadu4k kCd2byEMRIPQyaF5dIK/Dk2pFOz0w5j90/qKlN9QFOw8vscGVPqGoEysaRAy9Om/5+uE LLAKMFkvfgp9H/gWs4Ioxq6YO+YiKman/9GUo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DC8c8a/6+Z7E3WlJPUPHuVCl+TxLt3V29QvxdRB7I5fVs09A6JFfL+gQu/i/6qSgSA 1gJurQV84I33I6vZASpZc3AISEN//UjQno97j9A+5gAMUMQIcT+tgvGpW11XBBXRbzWB trcHlcP4kMTCUqtO1DhwvUVCVMl5otTMyiRBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.18.199 with SMTP id l49mr1263374wel.23.1244221005709; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:56:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200906051125.27820.dkulp@apache.org> References: <200906051125.27820.dkulp@apache.org> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:56:45 -0400 Message-ID: <61b5d9410906050956ya784ac0o2a607b2d616dd270@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Time to move trunk to 2.3 and create 2.2.x fixes branch... From: Benson Margulies To: dev@cxf.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: > > > With 2.2.2 out the door, I think it's probably time to create a 2.2.x fix= es > branch and move trunk to targetting 2.3. > > Basically, there are things that should start coming in that are more tha= n > just "bug fixes" that should probably be going toward 2.3. =C2=A0 The thr= ee > projects from the GSoC folks, the Woodstox upgrade and aegis validation, = I > have some code first/annotation ideas, some OSGi stuff, =C2=A0etc.... > > Any objections? > > -- > Daniel Kulp > dkulp@apache.org > http://www.dankulp.com/blog >