cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eoghan Glynn <eogl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Date Wed, 06 May 2009 15:25:05 GMT
Thanks Dan, should be sorted in this latest commit:

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772302&view=rev

/Eoghan

2009/5/6 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
>
>
> Pretty close.   Just mentioned on IRC that the source distro needs the
> LICENSE/NOTICE things.   Other than that, looks much better.
>
> Thanks!
> Dan
>
>
> On Wed May 6 2009 9:10:18 am Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
>> > OK.   That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>> >
>> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
>> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
>> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>>
>> I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and
>> pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/
>>main/release/README?view=markup
>>
>> I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev
>>
>> So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eoghan
>>
>> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
>> > OK.   That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
>> >
>> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
>> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
>> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>> >
>> > Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
>> > "uhh.....  what do I do with this?"    We definitely need a readme in
>> > there to describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site,
>> > the users@ list for questions, etc.....
>> >
>> > Dan
>> >
>> > On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
>> >> Hi Dan,
>> >>
>> >> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
>> >> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
>> >> documentation is available here:
>> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
>> >> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
>> >> greeter sample:
>> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
>> >> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
>> >> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
>> >> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
>> >> artefacts in maven.
>> >>
>> >> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
>> >> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
>> >> this should hold up the release.
>> >>
>> >> Hope this makes sense to you,
>> >>
>> >> David
>> >>
>> >> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
>> >> > I think I have to -1 this.   Couple legal things need to get ironed
>> >> > out:
>> >> >
>> >> > 1)  Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of
that
>> >> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf?     I ASSUME the
>> >> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure.     Also, there needs to
be a
>> >> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
>> >> > tag.    That would also go into dist.
>> >> >
>> >> > 2)  I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed.   For example:
>> >> > DOSGi doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed.   Not
>> >> > major, but if a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
>> >> >
>> >> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at
>> >> > least the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to
it.
>> >> >   See the LICENSE in the cxf distributions.   (remote-resources can
do
>> >> > that, I may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my
>> >> > backlog of email.  :-(   )
>> >> >
>> >> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples,
>> >> > possible a readme, etc...?     Should there be?   Not a big deal
>> >> > either way, but a bit strange.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Dan
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
>> >> >> Folks,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation
of
>> >> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
>> >> >> Specification[1].
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The staging area can be found at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Cheers,
>> >> >> Eoghan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
>> >> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Daniel Kulp
>> >> > dkulp@apache.org
>> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel Kulp
>> > dkulp@apache.org
>> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>

Mime
View raw message