cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release CXF dOSGi 1.0
Date Wed, 06 May 2009 14:46:15 GMT


Pretty close.   Just mentioned on IRC that the source distro needs the 
LICENSE/NOTICE things.   Other than that, looks much better.

Thanks!
Dan


On Wed May 6 2009 9:10:18 am Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> > OK.   That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
> >
> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
>
> I've added a README with an overview of the different distros and
> pointers to getting started docco, mailing lists, JIRA etc:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/cxf/dosgi/trunk/distribution/multi-bundle/src/
>main/release/README?view=markup
>
> I've also addressed your other concerns in these two commits:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=772157&view=rev
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=771670&view=rev
>
> So I think we should be good to go with a second cut at this release.
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> 2009/5/5 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> > OK.   That kind of make sense (along with what Eoghan said).
> >
> > However, I really think there needs to at least be a "README" in the
> > distributions that describes a little what it is along with pointers to
> > the walkthroughs and such on the website.
> >
> > Right now, I download and unpack the the tarball and I look at it and say
> > "uhh.....  what do I do with this?"    We definitely need a readme in
> > there to describe things as well as provide pointers off to the web site,
> > the users@ list for questions, etc.....
> >
> > Dan
> >
> > On Tue May 5 2009 5:31:49 am David Bosschaert wrote:
> >> Hi Dan,
> >>
> >> On the samples, they are not part of the distribution because they can
> >> be installed straight from the internet. All of the DOSGi
> >> documentation is available here:
> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi.html and which contains links
> >> to the sample source code and a very detailed walkthrough of the
> >> greeter sample:
> >> http://cxf.apache.org/distributed-osgi-greeter-demo-walkthrough.html
> >> As the OSGi containers install stuff straight from the internet, you
> >> don't have to have the bundles available locally. Once the release is
> >> out I'm planning to update this page to point straight to the sample
> >> artefacts in maven.
> >>
> >> There is no such page for the spring-dm demo, I'll take an action to
> >> provide such a page with the DOSGi documentation, but I don't think
> >> this should hold up the release.
> >>
> >> Hope this makes sense to you,
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> 2009/5/4 Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org>:
> >> > I think I have to -1 this.   Couple legal things need to get ironed
> >> > out:
> >> >
> >> > 1)  Since this is a full "distribution" type thing, what parts of that
> >> > staging area will go into www.apache.org/dist/cxf?     I ASSUME the
> >> > mutimodule bundle, but not really sure.     Also, there needs to be a
> >> > tar.gz or zip of a "source" distribution of the whole contents of the
> >> > tag.    That would also go into dist.
> >> >
> >> > 2)  I think some stuff in the NOTICE can be removed.   For example:
> >> > DOSGi doesn't ship the MTOSI stuff, that could be removed.   Not
> >> > major, but if a build has to be respun, let's get that cleaned up.
> >> >
> >> > 3) For the "distribution" builds, the LICENSE file needs to have at
> >> > least the pointers to the LICENSES of the bundled deps appended to it.
> >> >   See the LICENSE in the cxf distributions.   (remote-resources can do
> >> > that, I may be able to help out tomorrow if I get out from under my
> >> > backlog of email.  :-(   )
> >> >
> >> > 4) Actually, IS there a distribution that includes the samples,
> >> > possible a readme, etc...?     Should there be?   Not a big deal
> >> > either way, but a bit strange.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >> >
> >> > On Fri May 1 2009 12:39:48 pm Eoghan Glynn wrote:
> >> >> Folks,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm calling a vote to release CXF Distributed OSGi 1.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> The dOSGi subproject of CXF provides the Reference Implementation of
> >> >> the Distribution Software (DSW) component of the Distributed OSGi
> >> >> Specification[1].
> >> >>
> >> >> The staging area can be found at:
> >> >>
> >> >>   http://people.apache.org/~eglynn/stage_cxf_dosgi
> >> >>
> >> >> This release is tagged with cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0 at:
> >> >>
> >> >>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cxf/dosgi/tags/cxf-dosgi-ri-1.0
> >> >>
> >> >> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >>
> >> >> Please consider this call to vote as my +1.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers,
> >> >> Eoghan
> >> >>
> >> >> [1] See RFC 119 in
> >> >> http://www.osgi.org/download/osgi-4.2-early-draft3.pdf
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Daniel Kulp
> >> > dkulp@apache.org
> >> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message