Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-7414-apmail-cxf-dev-archive=cxf.apache.org@cxf.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 21520 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 -0000
Received: (qmail 3291 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3240 invoked by uid 500); 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@cxf.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@cxf.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@cxf.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.cxf.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org
Received: (qmail 3230 invoked by uid 99); 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:34:27 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [204.29.134.135] (HELO nmr.amfam.com) (204.29.134.135)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:34:19 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,413,1233554400";
   d="scan'208";a="11437016"
Received: from gw2.amfam.com (HELO rsgrl1coex01gw2.corporate.amfam.com)
 ([10.74.32.11])
  by nmr.amfam.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2009 10:33:46 -0500
Received: from NHQ1ACCOEX06VS1.corporate.amfam.com ([10.74.32.85]) by
 rsgrl1coex01gw2.corporate.amfam.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:33:45 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: wsdl2java<-->XJC "Options" being passed to SchemaCompiler does not
 seem to have effect
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:33:04 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <AC028B489A706F4DB1DACD06D07707AE0450315E@NHQ1ACCOEX06VS1.corporate.amfam.com>
In-Reply-To: <200903241125.19986.dkulp@apache.org>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: wsdl2java<-->XJC "Options" being passed to SchemaCompiler does
 not seem to have effect
Thread-Index: AcmslNm0c6q8Jzw1RJed7b3DIxz3LQAAB2VQ
References: <61b5d9410903230513u37e17283w6f9a1ad70f5c358a@mail.gmail.com>
 <61b5d9410903231732p10728c9cu5393091d60c4084d@mail.gmail.com>
 <61b5d9410903240400s5d42b940t7795652bdbfc35d4@mail.gmail.com>
 <200903241125.19986.dkulp@apache.org>
From: "Rao, Sameer V" <SRAO@amfam.com>
To: <dev@cxf.apache.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2009 15:33:45.0951 (UTC)
 FILETIME=[EB986EF0:01C9AC95]
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

I was looking at the JAXBDataBinding class
(cxf-tools-wsdlto-databinding-jaxb) and was not sure of the following-

1. We are building Options used by SchemaCompiler and calling its
parseArgument(). However, values passed through that argument list don't
seem to take any effect? Example the following-

				<wsdlOptions>
				    <wsdlOption>
=09
<wsdl>${basedir}/src/main/resources/MyService.wsdl</wsdl>
					<extraargs>

					    <extraarg>-xjc -verbose, -p
org.myapps.entities</extraarg>                             =20
					</extraargs>
				    </wsdlOption>
				</wsdlOptions>

Looking at the code in JAXBDataBinding, the call to
opts.parseArguments(args) should pass the above values to XJC and they
should have the intended effect. But I don't see it having.

2. In JAXBDataBinding we pass the schemas to XJC by the call-
addSchemas(opts, schemaCompiler, schemaLists); i.e. pass the schema
list. Would we gain any benefit by passing the WSDL itself? I read the
XJC accepts a WSDL with a -WSDL option?