Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16062 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2009 12:02:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Mar 2009 12:02:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 44181 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2009 12:02:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 44137 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2009 12:02:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 44126 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2009 12:02:12 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 04:02:12 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.77.186.17] (HELO mx3.progress.com) (192.77.186.17) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:02:03 +0000 Received: from mx3.progress.com (127.0.0.1) by mx3.progress.com (MlfMTA v3.2r9) id hlpmrm0171st for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:01:42 -0500 (envelope-from ) Received: from progress.com ([192.233.92.16]) by mx3.progress.com (SonicWALL 6.2.2.1073) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 07:01:41 -0500 Received: from NTEXFE01.bedford.progress.com (ntexfe01 [10.128.10.24]) by progress.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n24C1dQx016395 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:01:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from sberyoz ([10.5.2.12]) by NTEXFE01.bedford.progress.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: <00d501c99cc0$f990cc80$0c02050a@emea.progress.com> From: "Sergey Beryozkin" To: References: <61b5d9410903031547s291daeffka118e54e4a9c7222@mail.gmail.com> <009501c99cb7$5bb2ea10$0c02050a@emea.progress.com> <61b5d9410903040353n6878d863v363c02e650f8293e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Sun StaX versus JAX-RS Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:01:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2009 12:01:40.0571 (UTC) FILETIME=[FA6A8AB0:01C99CC0] X-Mlf-Version: 6.2.2.1073 X-Mlf-UniqueId: o200903041201410267570 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Ok, thanks - I'll will look into it asap Cheers, Sergey > You don't need jdk 1.6. This uses a maven depedency to get the parser > independently. > > Yes, we'll find some way to spike the test if there's no solution. > > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: >> Hi Benson >> >> I presume it's JDK 6 which needs to be used ? I'll try to look asap - I do >> need to close few issues raised recently against JAXRS plus do a bit of >> client api cleanup before 2.2 goes out. Can this test be disabled when run >> as part of the Psjsxp profile if it blocks you ? I'll try to look into this >> asap - but if it's indeed a bug/limitation in Axiom/Abdera then it won't be >> fixed before 2.2. anyway... >> >> Cheers, Sergey >> - Show quoted text - >> >> >>> Hello Department of Jax-RS: >>> >>> Dan and I have been working on supporting Sun's sjsxp, a stax >>> implementation built into newer JDK's. We've nearly got the whole >>> thing passing, save, significantly, for >>> >>> JAXRSAtomBookTest >>> >>> This fails inside of abdera/axiom complaining that it's trying to read >>> from a closed stream. >>> >>> This is probably going to wind around to a bug report for Abdera or >>> Axiom, but could I please pass the analysis over to the JAX-RS >>> politburo? >>> >>> To repro, >>> >>> mvn -Psjsxp >>> >>> --benson >> >>