cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Schema validation via Woodstox ... not for 2.2 :-)
Date Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:41:36 GMT
On Tue March 10 2009 9:33:14 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> I thought of a way to avoid branching and deleting, I've arranged for
> the bus extension not to register.
>
> And KK just made me a 'committer' on msv.

That's really cool.  

> And said that the 'nuclear' clause was a complete mistake.

Nice.   That will teach him to copy/paste without reading completely.  :-)

Dan



> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Tue March 10 2009 3:28:45 pm Benson Margulies wrote:
> >> Given the msv problems I've run into, the woodstox validation code
> >> doesn't belong in 2.2.
> >>
> >> My plan is:
> >>
> >> 1) commit current state, which is structurally relevant.
> >> 2) branch to sandbox.
> >> 3) delete the wstx-msv-validator module from the trunk.
> >> 4) extend the modularity fixes to the write side of the universe.
> >> 5) return to this topic for 2.2.x. Turning it on once the backend
> >> works can't be a giant problem.
> >
> > That works for me.  :-)
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://www.dankulp.com/blog

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message