cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Eoghan Glynn" <eogl...@progress.com>
Subject JMS clientReceiveTimeout default value
Date Fri, 12 Dec 2008 09:08:47 GMT


Folks,

Is a default value of 2000ms reasonable for the JMS clientReceiveTimeout?

For even moderately long-lived requests, this seems *way* too tight to me.

A timeout in the ballpark of 2s seems more appropriate for localhost demo-type situation where
you want the user to get rapid feedback if they've set things up wrong, or for tests where
again you want things to fail fast. But if that's the motivation, couldn't the demos/tests
just configure an appropriately tight timeout, but leave much more slack in the default?

Cheers,
Eoghan 

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message