cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: WS-SecurityPolicy in CXF 2.1.x, or just 2.2?
Date Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:05:15 GMT

BTW, is UsernameToken Profile implemented yet via WS-SecurityPolicy or just
the X.509 TP?

Thanks,
Glen


dkulp wrote:
> 
>> I would 
>> next like to test out the WS-SecurityPolicy configuration that Dan has
>> done.  Is it supported only on the CXF 2.2 branch or both 2.1.x and
>> 2.2?  
> 
> Just 2.2.   It's very "unstable" right now as I kind of move things 
> around to get it working.   Right now, there is pretty much no error 
> handling (it likely will just printStackTrace and continue with 
> unpredicatble results), I'll probably refactory the sending into 3 (or 
> more) interceptors, and the incoming messages are currently not 
> validated against the policies.  Basically, there is still much work to 
> do, but it's at a state where the basic usecases are working.  The MS 
> InteropFest usecases are now working (except the UsernameToken stuff, 
> and I'm not sure why yet.  Seems MS wants those encrypted, even if the 
> policy says not to, but I haven't dug into all that yet.  Not having a 
> windows box is slightly hindering that progress.)
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/WS-SecurityPolicy-in-CXF-2.1.x%2C-or-just-2.2--tp19830360p20711459.html
Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


Mime
View raw message