cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <>
Subject Re: XmlSchema, what do we need?
Date Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:21:34 GMT

The only thing I'd really LIKE to do is to try and get the type tests passing 
if we turn off the DOM schema cache.   One reason we keep the DOM around for 
the schema is due to XmlSchema losing stuff and thus the type tests fail with 
various validation issues.   Just about every XmlSchema release, I've 
reported another issue, that issue gets fixed, but then we hit another one.   
Each release goes a little furthur.

It's not a huge deal as the cache works fine and actually helps performance in 
some cases (and you committed the XmlSchema patch I submitted that makes it 
even better).   However, it has historically found bugs in XmlSchema so it 
might be good to run.   Could wait for 2.0 though.


On Monday 17 November 2008 6:44:55 am Benson Margulies wrote:
> Fellow CXF committers and interested parties:
> I am now a committer on XmlSchema. I've applied all the patches that
> were lying around, and I'm trying to fix some issues for which Dan
> Kulp has documented problems and not solutions. I plan to learn the
> release process and push out a 1.4.3 soon.
> If there are other issues in XmlSchema of a patch-sized sort that
> anyone wants to see addressed soon, please get them into the WSCOMMONS
> JIRA, preferably with a patch.
> I wouldn't complain about some help here. If any other CXF committer
> wants to join the party, I can push appropriate patches right along,
> which has the virtuous side-effect of creating you a track record to
> ask for committer status sooner rather than later.

Daniel Kulp

View raw message