cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Aegis versus jaxrs
Date Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:30:08 GMT
Sergey,

I'm not feeling like I'm doing a very good job of explaining myself
here. It's probably true that the best way for me to proceed is to
code something and with some comments that say: 'Sergey, I'm
frustrated HERE.' I've not been having the time to do more for CXF
than to address users with their hair on fire, but that might change.

--benson

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
<sergey.beryozkin@iona.com> wrote:
> Hi Benson
>
> I'm sorry If I'm too slow :-) but I'm still not getting what is it that
> you're proposing.
> That said, I believe that may be we should postponse the discussion on how
> to improve the overall
> JAX-RS implementation until after it reaches 1.0.
>
> In meantime, if we had even a basic JAX-RS Aegis provider such that peopple
> could start doing Aegis and REST or indeed combining SOAP and REST with the
> help of Aegis, then it would be cool IMHO....
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
>
>> I think I'm beginning to get the idea of what I'm trying to complain
>> about.
>>
>> An AegisDatabinding object has input configuration and it has state.
>> As it goes along, it constructs mappings for types.
>>
>> I'm having trouble swallowing a situation in which each individual
>> JAX-RS item does this independently, as opposed to all the of the
>> items in a service sharing a single state. Am I just confused?
>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
>

Mime
View raw message