cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bharath Ganesh" <bharathgan...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: WS-RM issue
Date Fri, 05 Sep 2008 19:22:00 GMT
So that is kind of an asynchronous invocation. Not a synchronous
request-response pattern.That again means the JIRA is not a very valid use
case. If convinced, I shall close the JIRA.


On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Eoghan Glynn <eoghan.glynn@iona.com> wrote:

>
> Dunno if I'd agree with this JIRA, if I've understood it correctly.
>
> For a request-response MEP, WS-RM can be configured so that a "202
> Accepted" response is immediately sent back to the client (possibly
> including an eager ACK) and then whenever it becomes available the real
> response is sent over a separate server->client connection.
>
> /Eoghan
>
>
>
> Bharath Ganesh wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-1156
>>
>> Look like WS-RM makes more sense for aysncronous invocation and one way
>> invocation (quite similar to JMS reliability), rather than a standard
>> request-response pattern.
>> So the above issue wont be a very valid case. Am I right?
>>
>>
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
> Registered Number: 171387
> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message