cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Willem Jiang <willem.ji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why are port and operations QNames in the jmx ON?
Date Sat, 06 Sep 2008 02:03:57 GMT
Hi Hadrian,

The port and operation could have different target namespace against the 
the service.
Maybe we could remove the namespace of port and operation in the 
ObjectName if they are same with the service's target namespace.

Regards,

Willem
Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that in the ObjectNames for PerformanceCounter the port and 
> operation are modeled as QName instead of String.  I believe that is 
> totally unnecessary and only makes the ONs long and harder to read.  
> Is there a reason for the port and operation to be qnames?  The 
> service is a QName and defines the namespace already.
>
> If you agree with this change I can contribute a patch.
>
>
> org.apache.cxf:bus.id=cxf945122723,type=Performance.Counter.Server,service="{http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http}SOAPService",port="{http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http}SoapPort"

>
>
> Thanks
> Hadrian
>
>


Mime
View raw message