cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Why are port and operations QNames in the jmx ON?
Date Fri, 05 Sep 2008 15:50:15 GMT
On Friday 05 September 2008 10:25:34 am Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that in the ObjectNames for PerformanceCounter the port and
> operation are modeled as QName instead of String.  I believe that is
> totally unnecessary and only makes the ONs long and harder to read.
> Is there a reason for the port and operation to be qnames?  The
> service is a QName and defines the namespace already.
>
> If you agree with this change I can contribute a patch.

Sure.  Contribute a patch.   :-)


>
> org
> .apache
> .cxf:bus.id=cxf945122723,type=Performance.Counter.Server,service="{http://a
>pache.org/hello_world_soap_http
> }SOAPService",port="{http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http}SoapPort"
>
> Thanks
> Hadrian



-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message