Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 62216 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2008 15:50:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jul 2008 15:50:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 19782 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2008 15:49:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cxf-dev-archive@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 19748 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2008 15:49:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@cxf.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@cxf.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@cxf.apache.org Received: (qmail 19554 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2008 15:49:44 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:49:44 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,WHOIS_MYPRIVREG X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lists@nabble.com designates 216.139.236.158 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:48:49 +0000 Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1KJsCo-0005Cr-12 for dev@cxf.apache.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:49:14 -0700 Message-ID: <18532231.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Mohan Radhakrishnan To: dev@cxf.apache.org Subject: Re: JSR 109 / 311. What sets CXF apart from Axis 2 as far as JSR's are concerned ? In-Reply-To: <1C5F6456-BD5B-461B-A068-E5C8E4412414@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: radhakrishnan.mohan@gmail.com References: <18484568.post@talk.nabble.com> <1C5F6456-BD5B-461B-A068-E5C8E4412414@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, Lots of helpful information. Looks like gathering some performance metrics about CXF JAXWS+JAXB also could be an important criterion. Do you have suggestions to measure this type of metric ? Moreover one reason we use XMLBeans for our client is because they want w3c compliance( 100% ? ) . I think we can also use XMLBeans with CXF. Is your JAXB implementation as compliant with w3c as XMLBeans ? Thanks, Mohan -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JSR-109---311.-What-sets-CXF-apart-from-Axis-2-as-far-as-JSR%27s-are-concerned---tp18484568p18532231.html Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.