cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <>
Subject Re: JSR 109 / 311. What sets CXF apart from Axis 2 as far as JSR's are concerned ?
Date Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:50:21 GMT

On Jul 18, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Mohan Radhakrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>       Lots of helpful information.
>       Looks like gathering some performance metrics about CXF JAXWS 
> also could be an important criterion. Do you have suggestions to  
> measure
> this type of metric ?

We have a "benchmark" directory which could be a staring point.   Last  
I tried with Axis2 (was 1.4 at the time), the JAX-WS support wasn't  
quite good enough to get it working though.      Metro/RI has other  
issue.  The "doJob" method needs a little updating to actually check  
if the response received is correct (which would affect results).    
Under load, the RI tends to send back invalid responses, but doesn't  
throw and exception.   The "numbers" look great, but aren't "real".   
(at least with the 2.0 version of the RI, haven't tried the 2.1 version)

>       Moreover one reason we use XMLBeans for our client is because  
> they
> want w3c compliance( 100% ? ) . I think we can also use XMLBeans  
> with CXF.

With 2.1.x, there is limited XMLBeans support.   There isn't much  
tooling around it though.  Thus, it's a bit tricky to work with.

> Is your JAXB implementation as compliant with w3c as XMLBeans ?

No idea, but definitely not 100%.  There was a message just last week  
about a schema construct that didn't work with JAXB.


> Thanks,
> Mohan
> -- 
> View this message in context:
> Sent from the cxf-dev mailing list archive at

Daniel Kulp

View raw message