cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christian Vest Hansen" <karmazi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: More news from the performance front
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:03:11 GMT
Woodstox claim to be validating on their front page.

>From the news section it looks like they got W3C Schema validation in
3.9.0 23-Nov-2007.

Just FYI.

On 3/19/08, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
>  The other issue with using woodstox is that I think you lose validation
>  entirely.
>
>  Dan
>
>
>
>  On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Dan Diephouse wrote:
>  > Benson Margulies wrote:
>  > > At this point, the startup performance of the bus is entirely
>  > > tangled up in Xerces. I'm having a hard time believing that building
>  > > a DOM from StaX is going to beat Xerces, but if someone else thinks
>  > > so, I guess I'm game.
>  > >
>  > > Sadly, there are no Apache-compatible XML databases I can see out
>  > > there, so my idea of 'compiling' all the XML files to DOM trees in
>  > > some sort of persistent store seems impossible.
>  >
>  > Woodstox provides a significantly faster SAX implementation than
>  > Xerces. But the question is - is the startup time in xerces because of
>  > validation or because of parsing? I'm guess the former.
>  >
>  > Its easy to test the Woodstox parser:
>  >
>  > java -Dorg.xml.sax.driver=com.ctc.wstx.sax.WstxSAXParser ....
>  >
>  > Dan
>
>
>
>  --
>
> J. Daniel Kulp
>  Principal Engineer, IONA
>  dkulp@apache.org
>  http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>


-- 
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Christian Vest Hansen.

Mime
View raw message