cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: More news from the performance front
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2008 23:05:03 GMT
I could easily woodstox only when we aren't validating, anyway.

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Christian Vest Hansen <karmazilla@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Woodstox claim to be validating on their front page.
>
> From the news section it looks like they got W3C Schema validation in
> 3.9.0 23-Nov-2007.
>
> Just FYI.
>
> On 3/19/08, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >  The other issue with using woodstox is that I think you lose validation
> >  entirely.
> >
> >  Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >  On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> >  > Benson Margulies wrote:
> >  > > At this point, the startup performance of the bus is entirely
> >  > > tangled up in Xerces. I'm having a hard time believing that
> building
> >  > > a DOM from StaX is going to beat Xerces, but if someone else thinks
> >  > > so, I guess I'm game.
> >  > >
> >  > > Sadly, there are no Apache-compatible XML databases I can see out
> >  > > there, so my idea of 'compiling' all the XML files to DOM trees in
> >  > > some sort of persistent store seems impossible.
> >  >
> >  > Woodstox provides a significantly faster SAX implementation than
> >  > Xerces. But the question is - is the startup time in xerces because
> of
> >  > validation or because of parsing? I'm guess the former.
> >  >
> >  > Its easy to test the Woodstox parser:
> >  >
> >  > java -Dorg.xml.sax.driver=com.ctc.wstx.sax.WstxSAXParser ....
> >  >
> >  > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >  --
> >
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> >  Principal Engineer, IONA
> >  dkulp@apache.org
> >  http://www.dankulp.com/blog
> >
>
>
> --
> Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
> Christian Vest Hansen.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message