cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: More news from the performance front
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:50:51 GMT

The other issue with using woodstox is that I think you lose validation 
entirely.

Dan


On Wednesday 19 March 2008, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Benson Margulies wrote:
> > At this point, the startup performance of the bus is entirely
> > tangled up in Xerces. I'm having a hard time believing that building
> > a DOM from StaX is going to beat Xerces, but if someone else thinks
> > so, I guess I'm game.
> >
> > Sadly, there are no Apache-compatible XML databases I can see out
> > there, so my idea of 'compiling' all the XML files to DOM trees in
> > some sort of persistent store seems impossible.
>
> Woodstox provides a significantly faster SAX implementation than
> Xerces. But the question is - is the startup time in xerces because of
> validation or because of parsing? I'm guess the former.
>
> Its easy to test the Woodstox parser:
>
> java -Dorg.xml.sax.driver=com.ctc.wstx.sax.WstxSAXParser ....
>
> Dan



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message