Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 79865 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 02:42:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 02:42:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 78354 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 02:41:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78307 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2008 02:41:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78298 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2008 02:41:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:41:50 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 66.249.82.236 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.249.82.236] (HELO wx-out-0506.google.com) (66.249.82.236) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:41:24 +0000 Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h30so50816wxd.21 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:41:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EPxcFTwJeT1OTKZMHCJ0vJyMnte6bPfIWvNt8+gE4Ag=; b=CGlLDs+oc7bzDqhGgqnKmxZyarO86F5dxrBkifoYIxKduBt+e2Lz9uAKnq+ZqnWKrb0fqx8ymUSsNXe0TNZqoqTJ8rHcFZod/XbHbPiNpqAXBpWp/BJhY50RBsGWmkJraIWPDaJt2NfMyY0H6kY86c9rRJS38GMG2PhPzxvFRCM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=CJMJAjM/ykMOxKn2Omvc29WhMjV6U3xXukk5Kj/Ssm+SLU0AWLY44kbpjHLpNsAPbL+60qTdWlKgdQO84bEl0CkUTP/XlZsgRgA1G2HbKzGooSk18ZP1Ho2Xsx9HYar7nWP/zIWX5h2svG8PzTmbZHiu+eGNinSSMshyW4Em1RQ= Received: by 10.142.191.2 with SMTP id o2mr32217wff.132.1201142488763; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:41:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.1.217.11? ( [74.94.172.193]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i6sm291349wxd.21.2008.01.23.18.41.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:41:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: WebParam vs. nillable From: Benson Margulies To: cxf-dev Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:41:28 -0500 Message-Id: <1201142488.7021.6.camel@bim-1330.basistech.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org While exercising the JavaScript code, I coded a doc/lit/bare service with a parameter of type SomeClass[]. The WSDL says that the resulting item is nillable. However, at runtime, JAXB doesn't act as if it is nillable. How do we communicate the type information for JAX-WS parameter items into JAXB in the first place?