Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sergey.beryozkin@iona.com
 designates 62.221.12.55 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <001001c85cdd$def6c060$e002050a@pcgroupiona.com>
From: "Sergey Beryozkin" <sergey.beryozkin@iona.com>
To: <cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org>
References: <1200960771.7032.1.camel@bim-1330.basistech.net>
Subject: Re: In trouble, proposing to subtract a process
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:02:17 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000D_01C85CDD.DEED2370"

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C85CDD.DEED2370
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi

What I do to debug such tests is I comment out the content of startServers(=
) and
and invoke the content of a run() directly from the test code...

> There was previous conversation about just allowing them to run all in
> one process, like many of our other test do.

But will it turn such tests into complicated unit tests ?

Cheers, Sergey

----- Original Message -----=20
From: "Benson Margulies" <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: "cxf-dev" <cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:12 AM
Subject: In trouble, proposing to subtract a process


> I've managed to make some of the WSA policy tests fail.
>=20
> These tests use the 'launch another process' discipline, which looks to
> make it pretty tough to debug the server end of things. In fact, I can't
> get them to run in Eclipse at all.
>=20
> There was previous conversation about just allowing them to run all in
> one process, like many of our other test do.
>=20
> Please speak up if you find this distressing.
>

----------------------------
IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C85CDD.DEED2370--