cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>
Subject Re: MtoM test question
Date Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:13:31 GMT
On Thursday 17 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> Relatedly, if wsdl2java produces 'the wrong thing' in terms of field
> type, is there some wsdl extension to shake it by the lapels?

I guess the question is: what do you mean by "wrong thing"?

Dan


>
> On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 16:17 -0500, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 January 2008, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > > There is a wsdl for MtoM. It seems to have a fairly simple
> > > structure of types and elements.
> > >
> > > Yet the wsdl2java for it concocts these complex INOUT holders.
> > >
> > > Why?
> >
> > Because the names (and types)  of parameters for the INs match the
> > names of the OUTS.   Thus, the spec state that those are to be
> > considered INOUT parameters which thus require Holders.



-- 
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer, IONA
dkulp@apache.org
http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message