cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sergey Beryozkin" <>
Subject Re: Fun with mtom
Date Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:04:48 GMT
Hi Benson

Many thanks. The reason I asked the question is that JAX-RS and JAX-WS, both relying on JAXB
in some way, are often seen as opposing technologies, so going forward, it might be worth
it to provide a number of bundles for different types of users, say, all CXF, JAXWS-only,
JAX-RS only...

Cheers, Sergey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Benson Margulies" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: Fun with mtom

> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 10:30 +0000, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
>> > Bad news: I introduced a bit of a dependency from the JAXBDataBinding on
>> > JAXWS, by actually using the MTOMFeature class to carry the facts
>> > downstream.
>> So, what if we were to repackage a CXF a bit such that say people interested in JAX-RS
only could get a bundle
>> which contains only JAX-RS and JAXB. Would your change prevent us from doing so ?
>> Thanks, Sergey
> It would have if I'd stuck with it. I reworked it to remove the
> dependency before I checked it in.

IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland)
Registered Number: 171387
Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message