cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mao <james....@iona.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo / CXF
Date Mon, 03 Dec 2007 02:39:15 GMT
But we should also do the interop test as well if we migrate it from 
YOKO, right?
With Orbix?

James

> Well, by CORBA, I really mean IIOP, but that's a detail.
>
> Basically, it's a combination binding (like soap) + transport (http) 
> where the JAXB (for example) objects get mashalled down to corba 
> streamables (instead of soap) and send on the wire via the IIOP stuff.  
>
> The tooling is basically tools to do things like:
> idl -> wsdl
> wsdl -> idl
> wsdl -> "wsdl with corba binding defined"
> etc...
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Friday 30 November 2007, Glen Mazza wrote:
>   
>> Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
>> binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Glen
>>
>> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>>     
>>> I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and
>>> think the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF
>>> project.   I've always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have
>>> been done in CXF to start off with.
>>>
>>> For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
>>> described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding
>>> for CXF.   It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but
>>> should work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or
>>> for a CXF server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps
>>> can talk to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd
>>> like to leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as
>>> I'd like to hear others thoughts about it.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>       
>
>
>
>   


Mime
View raw message