cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Glen Mazza <glen.ma...@verizon.net>
Subject Re: Wiki 2.0 versus 2.1
Date Sat, 15 Dec 2007 16:17:44 GMT
I wouldn't bother.  It would break the links to the docs in the user and
dev email archives.  If you can and want to create an alias CXF21DOC
that points to CXF20DOC, that could be a nice alternative.  But I don't
think most people care.

Glen

Am Samstag, den 15.12.2007, 10:19 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> Should we change the string to remove '2.0'?
> 
> On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 02:50 -0500, Glen Mazza wrote:
> > No, I would just add JAX2.1-specific sections in the text, given that
> > the two specifications have very heavy overlap.  Else we'd need to
> > update two different branches for every change.
> > 
> > Glen
> > 
> > Am Freitag, den 14.12.2007, 16:55 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > > Our users guide is labelled 2.0. Should we fork it?
> > > 
> > 
> 


Mime
View raw message