Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of
 bim2007@basistech.com does not designate 199.88.205.99 as permitted sender)
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: JRA puzzle
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:58:55 -0500
Message-ID: <E95FD77F0171D14DA1EEE0A785E92B43024D69B8@mail3.basistech.net>
In-Reply-To: <9A4696F35B459043970EE4A85A317390AEB3C9@amer-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
Thread-Topic: JRA puzzle
Thread-Index: Acgu8mYXaGEqSOkaREuN+wqf/y7YdwA+bNagAA/k+vA=
References: <E95FD77F0171D14DA1EEE0A785E92B43024D698B@mail3.basistech.net>
 <9A4696F35B459043970EE4A85A317390AEB3C9@amer-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
From: "Benson Margulies" <bim2007@basistech.com>
To: <cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
	"Daniel Kulp" <dkulp@apache.org>

Jervis,

I decided that CXF-1232 was to a first approximation a bug in my brain more than a bug in the code.  See CXF-1235 for the improved version.

If we decide to act on 1235, of course we don't want to blow up JRA in the process. However, I think that the idea here will be to put different information into the MessagePartInfo for the case in question rather than change the interpretation of what is there now. I was trying to do that when JRA imploded on my head.

--benson


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Jervis [mailto:jliu@iona.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 12:22 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; Daniel Kulp
> Subject: RE: JRA puzzle
> 
> Hi Benson, can I have your patch for cxf-1232 please, so that 
> I can try it out by myself to see what exactly the problem 
> is. Can I also have the name of failed JRA tests? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Jervis
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bim2007@basistech.com]
> > Sent: 2007年11月25日 7:33
> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; Daniel Kulp
> > Subject: JRA puzzle
> > 
> > I had a long struggle with CXF-1232. I came up with a fix.
> > 
> > Only problem is, it busts the JRA tests.
> > 
> > JRA expects not to get elements for parts.
> > 
> > But, ordinary Doc/Lit/Wrapped methods with no @RequestWrapper need 
> > them to get the element names right when they are specified with 
> > @WebParam.
> > 
> > There has to be some way for the 
> reflectionServiceFactoryBean to tell 
> > that this is going on, but I have yet to figure out what it is. If 
> > anyone can suggest to me how RSFB (as subclassed for JAXWS, 
> which is 
> > the structure of things in the JRA test) can tell that 
> there are these 
> > JRA annotations around, I'd be grateful.
> > 
> 
> ----------------------------
> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) Registered 
> Number: 171387 Registered Address: The IONA Building, 
> Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, Ireland
>