cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bim2...@basistech.com>
Subject RE: Junit 4 versus us
Date Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:40:05 GMT
And if one wants a protocol using overriden functions, one has to have
an @Before that uses a static boolean to make it run once. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Moesel [mailto:Christopher_Moesel@avid.com] 
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 7:26 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Junit 4 versus us
> 
> Yes, I've found that any code I want only to run once (per 
> test class) needs to go in a static block outside the 
> constructor.  That way it only gets processed the first time 
> the JVM loads the class.
> 
> -Chris
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bim2007@basistech.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 1:02 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Junit 4 versus us
> 
> 
> We have a fair number of junit tests that have code in their 
> constructor
> that should only be run once.
>  
> Imagine my surprise to discover that this is really not a good idea,
> since JUnit reconstructs for each test function.
>  
> 

Mime
View raw message