cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Kulp <>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Project Yoko from Incubator to Geronimo / CXF
Date Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:31:21 GMT

Well, by CORBA, I really mean IIOP, but that's a detail.

Basically, it's a combination binding (like soap) + transport (http) 
where the JAXB (for example) objects get mashalled down to corba 
streamables (instead of soap) and send on the wire via the IIOP stuff.  

The tooling is basically tools to do things like:
idl -> wsdl
wsdl -> idl
wsdl -> "wsdl with corba binding defined"


On Friday 30 November 2007, Glen Mazza wrote:
> Just to make sure I understand this correctly, when you mean "corba
> binding", you mean another transport, just like HTTP or JMS, correct?
> Thanks,
> Glen
> Am Freitag, den 30.11.2007, 16:27 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
> > I just want to go on record as saying I COMPLETELY support this and
> > think the CXF parts of this makes a lot of sense for the CXF
> > project.   I've always felt the binding parts of Yoko should have
> > been done in CXF to start off with.
> >
> > For those that aren't familliar with it, the yoko ws binding stuff
> > described in the proposal provides some tooling and a corba binding
> > for CXF.   It allows a CXF client (like a JAX-WS/JAXB client, but
> > should work with the other frontends) to talk to CORBA servers or
> > for a CXF server to be exposed as a CORBA server so other CORBA apps
> > can talk to it.
> >
> >
> > Anyway, Matt wants a vote to accept the proposal or not, but I'd
> > like to leave this open for discussion for a couple days first as
> > I'd like to hear others thoughts about it.
> >
> > Dan

J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194

View raw message