cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <>
Subject RE: stupid question about branches
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2007 20:31:52 GMT
Ok, here's a different suggestions. Snapshots off of just 2.0.3 or both?



From: Dan Diephouse [] 
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: stupid question about branches


I've not tried it either. I agree though that circular merges would be
confusing though. Benson, I'd recommend making your changes on trunk/
and then we can just run svnmerge later on the 2.0.x branch.

- Dan

Daniel Kulp wrote: 

We do have a 2.0.x branch: is setup to merge from trunk to that branch.   I just need
take some time to do it.   I'd prefer not to have "circular" merges 
(merges from trunk to it as well as merges from it to trunk).   I'm not 
sure how well handles the circular merges.   Anyone have 
experience with that?
On Sunday 30 September 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:

	Sure. And Dan K is manually planning to grab commits for 2.0.3.
	there were a branch already, (once my karma works) I'd be happy
	make some fixes in the 2.0.3 branch and then merge them in the

		-----Original Message-----
		From: Bozhong Lin []
		Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 10:17 PM
		Subject: Re: stupid question about branches
		trunk is essentially a branch for 2.1...
		Benson Margulies wrote:

			Howcome we don't have two visible branches, one
for 2.0.3 and one


			2.1, right now?


Dan Diephouse
MuleSource |

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message