cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bim2...@basistech.com>
Subject RE: MSV library
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:35:27 GMT
I completely agree. It was 'plan a' in my thoughts, and then I stumbled
onto that RelaxNG 'plan b'. 

I'd like to at least observe the errors from the two different
validators before I decide, and to do that I have to persuade mvn to
actually put msv into the classpath.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:34 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Benson Margulies
> Subject: Re: MSV library
> 
> 
> I have no problem including the MSV library, but I have to wonder if
it
> would make just as much sense to just "dom parse" using the parsers
and
> validators built into the JDK and the use a DOM base Stax reader to
> wrapper that to read into the stuff Aegis needs.   It would be very
> slightly slower, but if this is just for the "startup" config files, I
> think that's acceptable.   It's a one time hit.   And those files I
> THINK are fairly small (correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not an aegis
> expert) so it the hit may be unperceivable.
> 
> Thoughts?
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Thursday 20 September 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > I had an idea for how to get Aegis validation: Woodstox has RelaxNG
> > validation, and Sun has a converted from XSD to RNG.
> >
> >
> >
> > Only one little problem: Woodstox expects you to add the MSV library
> > to your app to get RNG validation.
> >
> >
> >
> > MSV comes with a ASF 1.0 license, dated 2000.
> >
> >
> >
> > Anyone have an appetite for this idea, or is this just too much
> > nonsense just to get more diagnosis of badly-typed .aegis.xml files?
> 
> 
> 
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog

Mime
View raw message