cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mao <james....@iona.com>
Subject Re: Is the idea of wsdl2java (aegis) really useful?
Date Mon, 24 Sep 2007 05:21:11 GMT
Yep, I agreed, make more sense from java to wsdl than from wsdl to java.

James

> Yeah, I think its definitely a waste of time to do an Aegis 
> schema->java. We would gain absolutely no benefit from it as far as I 
> can tell :-)
>
> - Dan
>
> Daniel Kulp wrote:
>> I had this conversation with Dan D. before and the thoughts were pretty 
>> much exactly the same.   If you are generating java code from schema, 
>> you should use the "standard" JAXB stuff since that supports more of the 
>> schema types than Aegis does.    Aegis is primarily targeted for the 
>> Java first case.   Having java -> wsdl tools for it makes sense.   
>> However, the wsdl -> java stuff makes less sense.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>> On Friday 21 September 2007, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>   
>>> I'm wondering why anyone would want this. If the user is going to run
>>> a code generator, what's wrong with JAXB? The virtue of Aegis is to
>>> avoid an infestation of snails (@) in existing code. Once you are
>>> firing up a generator, it's new code.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I note that Aegis has some not-very-documented capabilities, and I
>>> wonder if some of them are superior to JAXB in some way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we ever post some sort of [POLL] to the user list asking 'who would
>>> use this feature' questions?
>>>     
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>
>
> -- 
> Dan Diephouse
> MuleSource
> http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
View raw message