cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Diephouse <dan.diepho...@mulesource.com>
Subject Re: Please review, but don't commit (!) CXF-984 (aegis control of namespace prefixes)
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2007 12:58:35 GMT
Well actually your patch was much shorter than I had assumed because it 
only changes the namespaces of the wsdl. So I took a look at it and it 
looks fine! I will see if I commit this later today.

- Dan


Dan Diephouse wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I've got this on my agenda to look at. I may/may not get an email out 
> today to you. But I'm pretty sure I can get you feedback by tomorrow. 
> Thanks,
> - Dan
>
> Benson Margulies wrote:
>> CXF-984 provides a new feature: allow services to control the use of
>> namespace prefixes.
>>
>>  
>>
>> Now, in theory, no one should want to do this. However, there are two
>> reasons why this has come up.
>>
>>  
>>
>> 1)     wsdl readability.
>>
>> 2)     Primitive clients. If you are concocting a client in, say,
>> javascript or perl or someplace with a non-namespace-aware XML parser,
>> knowing what's going to show up in the prefixes can save a lot of
>> effort.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The proposed change here is rather lightweight. I claim that the
>> AegisDatabinding is the right place for this, since the prefixes
>> overarch the entire service. Pulling them out of .aegis.xml files can't
>> be made coherent.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The patch I posted needs more unit test, but I wanted to stop and see if
>> the rest of the group found this entire idea palatable before I pushed
>> it any further.
>>
>>  
>>
>> --benson
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>   
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
MuleSource
http://mulesource.com | http://netzooid.com/blog


Mime
View raw message