Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 50002 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2007 17:27:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Aug 2007 17:27:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 88859 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 17:27:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88821 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2007 17:27:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88812 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2007 17:27:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:27:30 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.233.182.185] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.185) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 17:27:25 +0000 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k4so520892nfd for ; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr7013864buc.1186507621986; Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.176.13 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7b774c950708071027v472a2ee2y13c7b50de8312878@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:27:01 -0400 From: "Dan Diephouse" To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org, dkulp@apache.org Subject: Re: 2.1 thoughts...... In-Reply-To: <200708071213.34356.dkulp@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_159133_30704104.1186507621954" References: <200708071213.34356.dkulp@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_159133_30704104.1186507621954 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/7/07, Daniel Kulp wrote: > 2) Data bindings - XmlBeans and JIBX have been on the list for a while > and I'm sure more XFire folks could find CXF more useful if we got those > working. There are two parts: runtime and tooling. The runtime support is relatively trivial to port from XFire. The part that concerns me more is the tooling as I'm not familiar with the tooling APIs at all :-) > > 4) Rest stuff - all the buzzword compatible stuff. :-) JSR 311 support would be nice, but quite a bit of work. 5) WS-* specs - do we have time to tackle any more of these at this > point? Which ones should we prioritize? The big ones that I see are: WS-SecureConversation, WS-Trust and WS-SecurityPolicy. They're a bit of work though. I've started some work locally on these, but haven't gotten that for - I'm more stuck in the joys of getting JAXB and WS-SecurityPolicy to play well with our existing generated classes for WS-Policy. > > > I hate to ask for more ideas as that alone is a TON of work, but at this > point, let's get the ideas flowing. :-) > > As I've hinted at before I think JAX-WS support should be our feature whereby we determine when we release. I.e. once we pass the TCK, lets do a release. If other features aren't done, we can knock off future releases quickly as those features are completed. We might even make it out of the incubator by then, so it'd be much faster :-) If we keep to the frequent release schedule, this should help us get out bug fixes faster and generate more project publicity as well. - Dan -- Dan Diephouse Envoi Solutions http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog ------=_Part_159133_30704104.1186507621954--