cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bozhong Lin <>
Subject Re: Questions on CXF-884. (Was Re: Graduating.....)
Date Thu, 16 Aug 2007 00:57:32 GMT
Hi Glen,

Following JIRA issues might be of your interest:


Glen Mazza wrote:
> According to another email, Dan K will be out on vacation for a few more
> days.  I'm available to look at other issues until he returns to answer
> my questions on this one.
> Glen
> Am Dienstag, den 14.08.2007, 17:23 -0400 schrieb Glen Mazza:
>> Thanks Dan K, CXF-884[1] has been quite helpful in understanding the
>> code more.  I have a few questions so far:
>> 1.) In the simple.xsd[2] and jaxws.xsd[3] configuration files, which
>> top-level elements need to have a "qualifyWrapperSchema" attribute
>> added?  I think it is *both* server and endpoint in jaxws.xsd, and just
>> server in simple.xsd, correct?  This attribute has no purpose in the
>> "client" element, correct?
>> [Also, if I need to add this attribute to the endpoint element, which
>> class should be modified to handle this value?  (I'm assuming the ones
>> given below--ReflectionServiceFactoryBean and JaxWsServiceFactoryBean
>> take care of just the server element, right?)]
>> 2.) When you say below, "the JaxWsServiceFactoryBean would need to be
>> changed from returning the hardcoded true/false to pulling info from the
>> configs", basically, you're just saying to remove the hardcoded method
>> and add a vanilla getter and setter, correct?  I believe Spring handles
>> the population of this value via dependency injection.
>> 3.) AFAICT, I need to be updating java2wsdl to handle this -qualified
>> property before testing this change, correct?  (I don't know how I can
>> test it otherwise.)  What is a good test plan for this change?
>> 4.) Perhaps a digression, but ReflectionServiceFactoryBean ideally
>> should be abstract, correct?  Outside of the test code, I don't see it
>> directly initialized anywhere--and am uncertain if it ever should be.
>> Thanks,
>> Glen
>> [1]
>> [2]
>> [3]
>> Am Dienstag, den 14.08.2007, 10:54 -0400 schrieb Glen Mazza:
>>> OK, I'm back and looking at this issue now...
>>> Glen
>>> Am Donnerstag, den 09.08.2007, 10:45 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>>>> Glen,
>>>> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 21:19, Glen Mazza wrote:
>>>>> Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2007, 21:49 -0400 schrieb Daniel Kulp:
>>>>>> So, the question becomes: what can we do to help others get more
>>>>>> involved in the CXF code?   That question is open to the
>>>>>> non-commiters as well. What can we do to help you?
>>>>> Personally speaking, I would very much like to move beyond my usual
>>>>> grammar checking and coding suggestions.  If people know of simpler
>>>>> tasks that are rather independent of other people's work, things I can
>>>>> do to start moving up the next few steps, emailing me privately or on
>>>>> this list would be appreciated.  I plan on spending more time looking
>>>>> at the JIRA's myself next week.
>>>> Just a thought, but CXF-884, while not "trivial", is not very hard 
>>>> either.   The runtime itself already supports it, it's just a matter of 
>>>> wiring it into the spring config and there should be a bunch of examples

>>>> of that.
>>>> Basically, in the ReflectionServiceFactoryBean (simple frontend), line 
>>>> 500, the method:
>>>>     protected boolean qualifyWrapperSchema() {
>>>>         return true;
>>>>     }
>>>> and the over-ridden method in the JaxWsServiceFactoryBean would need to 
>>>> be changed from return the hardcoded true/false to pulling info from the

>>>> configs.    A svn log on the jaxws.xsd whould probably yield a couple 
>>>> past commits that showed how to add config entries.   One of those could

>>>> be used as a model.   (this should be added to the "simple.xsd" 
>>>> processing as well)    
>>>> The next step, once that is working, would be to add a "-qualified=true"

>>>> flag to the java2wsdl tool.    :-)
>>>> Anyway, just throwing that out as an idea if you're interested.   The 
>>>> fact that the JAX-WS TCK pretty much requires we use unqualified schemas

>>>> really kind of sucks.  I'm not sure if that interests you or not.
>>>> Once we switch to working on JAX-WS 2.1, more stuff should pop up as 
>>>> well.   Theres a bunch of commented out methods in the jaxws frontend 
>>>> that will need implementations for 2.1.      (grep JAX-WS 2.1)   Even 
>>>> going through the 2.1 changelog and grabbing anything there is a start.

View raw message