cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benson Margulies" <bim2...@basistech.com>
Subject RE: manifest jar name
Date Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:56:53 GMT
Howcome that thought process doesn't apply to the other cxf jar, which
does have a number? And does Apache really force the silly token
'incubator' into every jar name?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 11:20 AM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: manifest jar name
> 
> i.e. without the version name? I think the idea is that people can
just
> depend on the manifest jar and not have to change any settings in
their
> build when they upgrade CXF. They'll just drop in a new manifest jar
which
> will point to the new version.
> 
> Cheers,
> - Dan
> 
> On 7/29/07, Benson Margulies <bim2007@basistech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why is the manifest jar named with a different convention than the
> > others?
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
View raw message