cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Guillaume Nodet" <gno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release plan consensus...
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2007 07:01:39 GMT
It seems to me that this is the usual process.
Keep trunk for the next major version and create
branches for maintenance branches.

On 6/26/07, Bozhong Lin <blin@iona.com> wrote:
>
> Note current trunk pom version is "2.1-incubator-snapshot". Instead of
> asking people to create a branch for new features, another option would
> be to create a branch for 2.0.1 release, and let people continue use
> trunk for 2.1 release works. In this way, any fixes that go into trunk
> can be selectively merged to 2.0.1 release branch.
>
> We need to change pom version to "2.0.1-incubator-snapshot" anyway.
>
> Regards,
> Bo
>
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
> > I think there was some consensus in the previous thread about what to do
> > with the release process. I think this leaves us with a few takeaways.
> > warning: some of my own opinions/desires are inter:
> >
> > 1. /trunk is 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT. No destabilizing changes should be made
> > to head
> > (not going to try to define this - I think its ultimately up to us to
> > make
> > judgement calls).
> >
> > 2. 2.0.1 should follow about 3-4 weeks from now. I.e. the week of the
> > 16th.
> >
> > 3. Any major changes should be done in a branch for now. I'm not sure
> > if we
> > should have a 2.1 branch or if we should just have branches for
> > individual
> > features. I'm guess probably just branches for individual features for
> > now
> > until 2.0.1 is released, and then we can merge everything into trunk.
> > Though
> > I think the JAX-WS 2.1, JAXB 2.1, and WS-SX stuff are all intertwined at
> > least, so that will all need to happen in the same code base.
> >
> > 4. 2.1 Should probably happen as soon as we finish TCK testing. That
> > should
> > give anyone ample time to get new features in if they want. Any features
> > which don't make it can go into 2.2, which should hopefully follow 8-10
> > weeks after.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
>



-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Principal Engineer, IONA
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message