Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 2273 invoked from network); 2 May 2007 18:22:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 May 2007 18:22:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 8691 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:22:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8658 invoked by uid 500); 2 May 2007 18:22:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 8649 invoked by uid 99); 2 May 2007 18:22:07 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:07 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [206.46.252.48] (HELO vms048pub.verizon.net) (206.46.252.48) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 02 May 2007 11:22:00 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([72.93.84.92]) by vms048.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JHF0096AF02GBL0@vms048.mailsrvcs.net> for cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 02 May 2007 13:21:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:21:37 -0400 From: Fred Dushin Subject: Re: HTTP (Proxy) Authorization Policy In-reply-to: <4638A863.7020502@iona.com> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <463755BA.6060701@iona.com> <4638A863.7020502@iona.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Sounds like a flesh-and-blood bug to me, so I'd file it. On May 2, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Polar Humenn wrote: > Does anybody mind if I file a JIRA on this issue? > -Polar > > Polar Humenn wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Currently the HTTP Authorization Policy is set on the Bus, >> Endpoint, Message etc. maps by keying it on its class. >> >> The problem is that the AuthorizationPolicy class is used for both >> the user authorization and proxy authorization. Therefore the >> "proxy" authorization policy can't be set by this method. >> >> This could easily be fixed by creating a trivial extension >> >> public class ProxyAuthorizationPolicy extends AuthorizationPolicy {} >> >> There may be a little work to make spring config work, i.e. >> setProxyAuthorization(), but not much. >> >> What are people's thoughts? >> >> Cheers, >> -Polar > >