Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of ning.jiang@iona.com designates
 65.223.216.181 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <464BD6FC.8020902@iona.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:15:56 +0800
From: Willem Jiang <ning.jiang@iona.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Proper destroy() method for jaxws:endpoint
References: 
 <05F5FDC16A447442B12B21A432878AC501029AD6@amer-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
In-Reply-To: 
 <05F5FDC16A447442B12B21A432878AC501029AD6@amer-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Seumas,

Soltysik, Seumas wrote:
> The current designated destroy method for the jaxws:endpoint spring bean is EndpointImpl.stop(). The effect of calling this stop() method is to remove the endpoint from an endpoints list. 
>
>         if (mo instanceof MultipleEndpointObserver) {
>             ((MultipleEndpointObserver) mo).getEndpoints().remove(endpoint);
>         } else {
>             getDestination().setMessageObserver(null);
>         }
>
> However, it does not actually shutdown/deactive the associated Destination it only diables the endpoint. I am not sure that this makes sense to me. When the destroy method is called on the jaxws:endpoint bean, should the endpoint simply be made unavailable or should the infrastructure for that endpoint be torn down?
>
>   
Maybe DanD can answer this question.
I just checked out the change log of MultipleEndpointObserver
MutlipleEndpointObserver. If multiple a user attempts to register 
multiple endpoints on the same address, this observer will be created. 
Various binding interceptors and routing interceptors will be added to it.

Does it mean that the endpoints within the MultipleEndpointObserver 
could still listen to the other address?
> Should the EndpointImpl.stop() method be changed to deactivate the Destination or does it need to keep the same behavior per the JAX-WS spec? Do we need to add a special EndpointImpl.shutdown() method and use this as the jaxws:endpoint destroy() method?
>
> Regards,
> Seumas
>
>   

Cheers,
Willem.