cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: HTTP (Proxy) Authorization Policy
Date Thu, 03 May 2007 01:20:51 GMT
Agreed. I think the proposed solution is reasonable, but it doesn't exactly
strike me as pretty - which is why I hadn't responded quite yet. :-)
Granted, I don't have any better ideas, so maybe thats the best way to go.

Cheers,
- Dan

On 5/2/07, Fred Dushin <fred@dushin.net> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a flesh-and-blood bug to me, so I'd file it.
>
> On May 2, 2007, at 11:04 AM, Polar Humenn wrote:
>
> > Does anybody mind if I file a JIRA on this issue?
> > -Polar
> >
> > Polar Humenn wrote:
> >> Greetings,
> >>
> >> Currently the HTTP Authorization Policy is set on the Bus,
> >> Endpoint, Message etc. maps by keying it on its class.
> >>
> >> The problem is that the AuthorizationPolicy class is used for both
> >> the user authorization and proxy authorization.  Therefore the
> >> "proxy" authorization policy can't be set by this method.
> >>
> >> This could easily be fixed by creating a trivial extension
> >>
> >> public class ProxyAuthorizationPolicy extends AuthorizationPolicy {}
> >>
> >> There may be a little work to make spring config work, i.e.
> >> setProxyAuthorization(), but not much.
> >>
> >> What are people's thoughts?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -Polar
> >
> >
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message