cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Polar Humenn <phum...@iona.com>
Subject Re: Checkstyle
Date Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:04:14 GMT
Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> *snip*
>
> Either way, perhaps the checkstyle rule might be relaxed for abstract classes which do
not implement interfaces, otherwise if they do then the high chance is the user will want
to pass the interface around rather than the abstract class.
>   

I really don't like such generalizations. Just because there is a "high 
chance" that "the user" will do something doesn't afford a regulation 
for prerequisites.

Cheers,
-Polar

Mime
View raw message