cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: Servlet and cxf-servlet.xml
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:21:25 GMT
Well if no one objects, I'm going to get rid of the support for <endpoints>
and just have CXF delegate to Spring for this case. I really don't want to
explain to users which configuration format they have to use...

- Dan

On 3/24/07, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Did we ultimately decide to get rid of the support for the JAX-WS RI
> <endpoints> syntax? Or use XSLT? Or keep the JAX-WS RI syntax?
>
> I just want to make sure we don't distribute something in 2.0 that we
> aren't really planning on supporting. My preference would be to just
> standardize on the Spring syntax. The namespace declarations are a little
> verbose, but at least we're consistent across the board.
>
> <beans xmlns="http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"
>       xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance "
>       xmlns:jaxws="http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws"
>       xsi:schemaLocation="
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans
> http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans/spring-beans-2.0.xsd
> http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws http://cxf.apache.org/schema/jaxws.xsd">
>
>    <jaxws:endpoint id="endpoint1"
>               implementor="org.apache.hello_world_soap_http.GreeterImpl "
>               address="http://localhost/services/Greeter1"
>               wsdlLocation="/wsdl/hello_world.wsdl"
>               />
> </beans>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog




-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message