cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: Can we distribute the sun mail and activation jar files in our distribution?
Date Tue, 20 Feb 2007 22:52:15 GMT
Any one know if any implementations send ^M in attachment headers? I could
see this causing issues if so.
- Dan

On 2/20/07, Daniel Kulp <daniel.kulp@iona.com> wrote:
>
>
> Rick,
>
> On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:35, Daniel Kulp wrote:
> > On Tuesday 20 February 2007 10:15, Rick McGuire wrote:
> > > Geronimo has implementations of activation-1.1 and mail-1.4.  I was
> the
> > > author of both.
> >
> > Oh.   Cool.   Last I had checked (early Dec), they were in trunk, but
> not
> > yet available on the maven repositories.  (not released)   I see they
> are
> > there now.   And annotation.   Good.  I'll see if CXF can build/run with
> > them.
>
> OK.  I managed to get CXF to use the geronimo specs versions of
> annotation,
> servlet, mail, and activation.    I had some problems with Mail.   The
> Geronimo Specs version is definitely not a 100% drop in replacement for
> Sun's
> 1.4 versions.   The InternetHeaders object from Sun is much more tolerant
> of "out of spec" streams (example: unix EOL style) than Geronimo.   We had
> a
> couple tests that failed, but it's because of bad test data.   As soon as
> I
> did a unix2dos on the test data, the tests passed.
>
> Anyway, I'm committing the changes to CXF now.
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727    C: 508-380-7194
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
>



-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message