cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "David Greco" <grec...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Using javolution XML parser inside CXF
Date Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:25:08 GMT
Hi Dan,
thanks for the reply, I was looking at the cxf code, I couldn't find any
usage reference to the woodstox package. Any hint ?

On 2/20/07, Dan Diephouse <dan@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> I took a look at Javalution, but I'm a little bit skeptical. First, they
> completely changed the StAX API in an incompatabile way which was
> unnecessary. We can develop backward compatabile extensions to enable
> efficient access of ints/longs/etc. Not that there is that much
> performance
> value in that (at least from my limited tests). However, that limits our
> ability to use it within CXF - we could develop something to enable it,
> but
> that would be a lot of work and....
>
> Second, I don't see any verification that their parser is actually faster
> than Woodstox on their website. Tatu, the woodstox author, did some
> benchmarking though. Woodstox is actually 20-25% faster than the
> Javalution
> parser. :-)
>
> Cheers,
> - Dan
>
> On 2/20/07, David Greco <greco.d@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > looking at the Javolution initiative www.javolution.org, I was really
> > amazed
> > by the performances of their pull parser, so I wonder if it's possible
> to
> > use the Javolution parser, I think it could give CXF an excellent burst
> in
> > terms of performance.
> > Regards,
> > David
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message