Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 34053 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2007 10:47:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jan 2007 10:47:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 25798 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2007 10:47:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25770 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2007 10:47:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25761 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2007 10:47:22 -0000 Received: from herse.apache.org (HELO herse.apache.org) (140.211.11.133) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:47:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (herse.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [207.113.241.148] (HELO iss04.interliant.com) (207.113.241.148) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:47:12 -0800 Received: from EX-008.mail.navisite.com (ex-008.interliant.com [207.113.240.188]) by iss04.interliant.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id l0HAkoe06297 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:46:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from EX-201.mail.navisite.com ([172.16.1.41]) by EX-008.mail.navisite.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:46:46 -0600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C73A24.C860F717" Subject: RE: WS-RM interop Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:45:56 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: WS-RM interop thread-index: Acc5lvPmeadYn6tgSxuXujZK1iH1zAAiSJ0AAAElMaI= References: From: "Mark Little" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jan 2007 10:46:46.0323 (UTC) FILETIME=[C8AAF830:01C73A24] X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73A24.C860F717 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can I just check: are we talking about OASIS WS-RM, OASIS WS-RX, = WS-Reliability or WS-Reliable Messaging (WS-RM)? Mark. -----Original Message----- From: Glynn, Eoghan [mailto:eoghan.glynn@iona.com] Sent: Wed 1/17/2007 4:16 AM To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: WS-RM interop =20 Hi Guillaume, This is definitely something we need to do, especially in the light of the recent extended discussion about partial responses, and the minor modifications identified to allow for wider interop (tolerance to Systinet partial response with response code 200, usage of null content-type to indicate an empty HTTP entity-body etc...). I'm going to capture these mods in a JIRA issue. We'll probably need to close that off first, then look at doing the actual interop testing. Cheers, Eoghan > -----Original Message----- > From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:gnodet@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: 16 January 2007 17:51 > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: WS-RM interop >=20 > Has anyone tried CXF WS-RM implementation interoperability=20 > with other existing implementations ? .Net, Axis2, etc ... >=20 > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/) > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C73A24.C860F717--