cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: Identification of Partial Responses
Date Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:18:20 GMT
Quick question regarding #2 - Do other RM implementations include a
RelatesTo header in partial responses?

Also, could we determine if its a partial response by checking to see if the
Action is a SequenceAcknowledgement?

- Dan

On 1/9/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eoghan.glynn@iona.com> wrote:
>
>
> OK, back to the drawing board on this one :(
>
> A quick google on this question suggests that, notwithstanding some
> confusion, an empty SOAP body is actually kosher in certain
> circumstances ... see for example [1].
>
> So off the top of my head, I think we'd have to do something like the
> following to make the partial/full response distinction more
> bullet-proof:
>
> 1. Stop sending the wsa:RelatesTo in the partial response (this is
> potentially misleading in any case)
> 2. Set something like a Message.IS_RESPONSE property to false in the
> WS-A layer if the wsa:RelatesTo header is not present
> 3. Replace the ClientImpl.isPartialResponse() logic with
> Boolean.FALSE.equals(inMessage.get(Message.IS_RESPONSE))
>
> Checking via Boolean.FALSE.equals() would ensure that the ClientImpl
> logic would be valid even if WS-A layer was absent (in which case the
> IS_RESPONSE property would be null, but we can assume that a partial
> response would never be received, as this may only occur if WS-A headers
> were present in the corresponding request).
>
> Cheers,
> Eoghan
>
> [1]
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jbossws-issues/2006-October/000022.html
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrea Smyth [mailto:andrea.smyth@iona.com]
> > Sent: 09 January 2007 09:58
> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Identification of Partial Responses
> >
> > Further to the dicussions on the
> > "JaxwsInterceptorRemoverInterceptor and RM" subject on the
> > different ways to identify a partial response I came accross
> > an example of application messages with empty soap bodies.
> > This is in the
> > org.apache.cxf.systest.basicDOCBare.DOCBareClientServerTest
> > system test, where the response to the putLastTradedPrice
> > invocation is a soap message with an empty body.
> > Addressing is not involved.
> > First off, is the empty ssoap body OK and to be expected?
> > Secondly, if it is, what should I expect if this
> > client-server setup uses addressing and non-anonymous
> > ReplyTo? It seems we can distinguish the partial response
> > from the real response not by checking for an empty body
> > (regardless if this results in empty of no list content in the
> > message) but need to look also at the addressing headers ...
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Andrea.
> >
>



-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message