cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Dan Diephouse" <...@envoisolutions.com>
Subject Re: JAX-WS 2.1 and JAX-WSA [was Re: Next Release]
Date Wed, 03 Jan 2007 05:12:36 GMT
That is great news. Thanks Ted!

On 1/2/07, Ted Neward <ted@tedneward.com> wrote:
>
> IIRC, JAXWSA was canceled due to the fact that the WS-Addressing stuff was
> to be included in JAX-WS; I think I still have the JAXWSA notification
> from
> my (sporadic) days on the JAXWSA EG.... Yep, it was withdrawn on 12/11, by
> Arun. In an earlier email (on 8/8), he wrote:
>
> "JSR-261 has been operating under the assumption that it would layer on
> top
> of JAX-WS 2.0. This enabled us to provide WS-Addressing functionality
> without delaying the JAX-WS 2.0 EG. The plan was to later make this JSR
> into
> a required component of a future version of the Java web services stack.
>
> "After looking at the current state of JSR 261 and listening to the
> feedback
> we received from community, this API seems to provide a rich and powerful
> API for WS-Addressing that is more targeted to stack implementors rather
> than to the end developer. In order to simplify the programming model for
> WS-Addressing for JAX-WS developers, we are revisiting those initial
> assumptions at the first available opportunity, namely the upcoming JAX-WS
> 2.1 Maintenance Release (MR).
>
> "We would like to converge the JSR 261 specification and API with the
> upcoming JAX-WS 2.1 MR. Here is a top-level summary of the proposed
> changes:
>
> 1). Simpler abstraction of EndpointReference as a first-class citizen in
> JAX-WS.
> 2). Standard way to enable WS-Addresing in JAX-WS using @BindingType.
> 3). Various JAX-WS APIs expose/consume EPR.
> 4). Action/FaultAction moved from JSR 261 to JAX-WS MR.
>
> "A detailed proposal outlining all the details will be available shortly.
> JAX-WS 2.1 MR plan will be shared with the JSR 224 in the next few days as
> well. Since all the relevant functionality from JSR 261 will be
> incorporated
> in the JAX-WS MR, this would also mean that JSR 261 will be withdrawn from
> the JCP.
>
> "We believe this approach is the right thing to do for the specifications,
> the platform and the community. Let me know if you think differently.
>
> "I can host a concall if you feel the need to discuss these changes in
> more
> detail."
>
> HTH....
>
> Ted Neward
> Java, .NET, XML Services
> Consulting, Teaching, Speaking, Writing
> http://www.tedneward.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 9:20 AM
> > To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: JAX-WS 2.1 and JAX-WSA [was Re: Next Release]
> >
> > I'm reading through the spec and it actually looks like JAX-WSA is by
> JAX-
> > WS
> > 2.1. The new version of the JAX-WS spec seems to include the Action
> > annotation among other things. Although it doesn't say that. Anyone know
> > whats going on here?
> >
> > - Dan
> >
> > On 1/2/07, Glynn, Eoghan <eoghan.glynn@iona.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> > > >
> > > > Along with this, it would be interesting to start on JAX-WSA
> > > > - or at least got started on it. JAX-WSA is just a few
> > > > annotations for WS-Addressing and some interfaces for
> > > > representing EPRs [2].
> > >
> > > Yep, this is on my TODO list.
> > >
> > > For background, note that JAX-WSA was still in an unfinished state of
> > > flux when we started on the original Celtix WS-A layer (which forms
> the
> > > basis of the CXF WS-A layer). Hence the initial focus was on
> > > implementing the WS-A mechanics, rather than following the moving
> > > goal-posts of the unpublished APIs.
> > >
> > > In the meantime however, obviously JAX-WSA has matured, gone thru' a
> > > revision and has been rolled into JAX-WS, so its defininitely time
> that
> > > we synched up with the latest spec.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Eoghan
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dan Diephouse
> > Envoi Solutions
> > http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.2/613 - Release Date: 1/1/2007
> > 2:50 PM
> >
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.3/614 - Release Date: 1/2/2007
> 2:58 PM
>
>
>
>


-- 
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message