Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (herse.apache.org: domain of Bozhong.Lin@iona.com
 designates 65.223.216.181 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <456BD68F.30205@iona.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:26:23 +0800
From: Bozhong Lin <blin@iona.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: cutting a new release build (was: Re: WS-I license issues,
 MTOM sample
 from JAXWS-RI)
References: <9A4696F35B459043970EE4A85A31739017650D@amer-ems1.IONAGLOBAL.COM>
 <4566D43D.1090204@iona.com>
In-Reply-To: <4566D43D.1090204@iona.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I will go ahead and cut another release build with all the changes. The 
release process will start in the next hour or so. Please let me know if 
you are going to commit any code during the next two hours.

Thanks,
Bo

Bozhong Lin wrote:
> With Tom's fix and my commit for fixing license header issues, what 
> should we do next? Shall we cut a new build out of mainline, or shall 
> we migrate those fixes to M1 tag and build new kit from M1 tag? I am 
> ok to cut a new build from mainline, since it includes several fixes 
> for Eclipse tooling in the last week and also includes some servlet 
> transport improvement/fixes.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Cheers,
> Bo
>
> Li, Tao (Tom) wrote:
>> Hi Dan.D,
>>
>> Sorry for the issues brought by mtom module.
>> I've commited a fix for mtom, now it only has systest & demo for xop, 
>> the swa case has been discarded.
>>
>> If we using import from the location set to network, the demo can 
>> also support the swa feature without involve license issues.
>>
>> But previousely we have already made efforts to let the build &
>> demo working in offline mode.
>>
>> It's better that not break the offline support. So I discard the swa
>> cases even our system support it.
>>
>> Please help to review and give your comments.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>  
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
>>> Sent: 2006?11?23? 17:48
>>> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: WS-I license issues, MTOM sample from JAXWS-RI
>>>
>>>
>>> I've removed all copies of the wsi-swa.xsd under the WS-I license 
>>> per the
>>> request from Robert on general@incubator as it is not legal for us 
>>> to have
>>> them in SVN. If anyone knows of other files please speak up. We 
>>> should go
>>> through and double check that all the files which use licenses from
>>> standards organizations are OK. Yes, this breaks the build, but 
>>> immediate
>>> action needed to be taken.
>>>
>>> ALSO, the MTOM sample and the MTOM WSDL/XSD in testutils appears to be
>>> directly copied from the JAX-WS RI. It may have ultimately 
>>> originated from
>>> somewhere else, but I can't figure out where. If this it did come 
>>> from the
>>> JAX-WS RI, it is VERY not cool. CDDL sources can not be included in 
>>> Apache
>>> SVN. If there are any other things that people have copied, speak up 
>>> now and
>>> get them removed ASAP.
>>>
>>> - Dan
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Dan Diephouse
>>> Envoi Solutions
>>> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>>>
>>>