cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From James Mao <>
Subject Re: Kit testing issues
Date Thu, 30 Nov 2006 09:50:00 GMT
Yes, at least we find a work around solution.
I suspect it's a bug in Rhino , but  i'm not 100% sure about this,
I write a  test.html and put the code in, still have the same problem,
without the comment it's ok, add the comment fail, so might be in E4X

> If adding Apache License headers causes program to break, then we can 
> leave the file without license headers and then add readme or note 
> somewhere to apply for exemptions. I will take care of the issue.
> Regards,
> Bo
> James Mao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>>> I found following issues:
>>>> 1. js_provider demo:
>>>>        [java] Invoking server through Dispatch interface using 
>>>> SOAPMessage
>>>>    [java] Response from server: Hi undefined
>>>>    [java] Invoking server through Dispatch interface using 
>>>> DOMSource in PAYLOAD Mode
>>>>    [java] Response from server: Hi Heron
>>>> The first request return "Hi undefined" , not sure it's correct. 
>>>> and in server dir, there are three response xml files, but client 
>>>> side only have two request xml files.
>>>> I'll looking into this, and will port a system tests for this.
>> I finally got time to look into the problem, and the problem is the 
>> GreetMeDocLiteralReq1.xml has Apache license header, and it's xml 
>> comment, that cause the impl.jsx
>> can not get the name from (req..ns::requestType)[0];  if we remove 
>> the comment from the xml, demo works fine, or if we place the license 
>> header at the end of the xml, that works also fine.
>> I'm not sure it's the bug in Rhino or something else. i'm not an 
>> expert on E4X
>> So my solutions are
>> 1. Take Apache license header as Apache license footer, not sure it's 
>> OK in Apache process?
>> 2. Hard code the response message, not good though.
>> 3. Ask  JS experts, take time...
>> Cheers,
>> James.

View raw message