cxf-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Sakala, Adinarayana" <ASAK...@iona.com>
Subject RE: Areas to get involved...
Date Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:11:33 GMT
>     * JAX-WS TCK and smaller details (we have a lot of JAX-WS done, we
>       just need to focus on the details now)
Does Apache or anybody on CXF has access to JAX-WS TCK?
It would be great to say how compliant we are with JAX-WS at each
milestone.

-Adi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dan Diephouse [mailto:dan@envoisolutions.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 5:33 PM
> To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Areas to get involved...
> 
> Kevin Conner wrote:
> 
> > Dan Diephouse wrote:
> >
> >> Was chatting with a few people here at ApacheCon and we came up
with
> >> the idea that we should have a page on how to get involved. So, I
> >> went ahead and created one:
> >>
> >> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CXF/Getting+Involved
> >>
> >> I only have a few ideas on there right now (I'm sure I'll think of
> >> more later too), but hopefully others can contribute some ideas as
> well!
> >
> >
> > I was just composing an email about doing this :-).
> >
> Cool :-)
> 
> > I went through the wiki/jira and didn't see much about longer term
> > objectives, things are obviously focused on the M1 release.  The
wiki
> > index page seems to cover a lot of areas and I wondered whether it
> > would be a good idea to flesh some of them out.  These could be
added
> > to the 'ideas' section on the above page.
> >
> Yes, I think it would be a good idea to flesh them out. Some of the
high
> level things I was thinking of M2:
> 
>     * JAX-WS TCK and smaller details (we have a lot of JAX-WS done, we
>       just need to focus on the details now)
>     * JBI integration
>     * WS-Security
>     * WS-RM
>     * Asynchronous HTTP support on client & server
>     * Refactor tooling to use service model
>     * WSDL 2
> 
> > It would also be helpful, to me at least, if there was some notion
of
> > priority attached to these items.  Do people feel this is warranted?
> >
> Yup, good idea.
> - Dan
> 
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> (616) 971-2053
> Envoi Solutions LLC
> http://netzooid.com


Mime
View raw message