Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@locus.apache.org Received: (qmail 37891 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2006 14:59:23 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2006 14:59:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 17020 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 14:59:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cxf-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16979 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2006 14:59:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cxf-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 16970 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2006 14:59:22 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:59:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of gnodet@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:59:13 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x4so2465163nfb for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:57:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rDs1uv1afIvwAkO6+Xfp3tU2HvrjdlOiwllukcpkTefZ47vN+sIJymmIfBHz/P/3/dwGIm8u7ShHKdN39yaxjpiRebHLQn1yKZTkMKSxfHjZx+9zSHx25VQgRRvDRkinooAm5E6pd8vhFul3fxz9LtfJI1zDtW2keM7YicEuRAQ= Received: by 10.49.29.2 with SMTP id g2mr13441554nfj; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.85.1 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:57:43 +0200 From: "Guillaume Nodet" To: cxf-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Wrapped operation info In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N On a related point, the MessagePartInfo.isInSoapHeader() information is part of the binding and not part of the abstract model ... This information should also be moved on the BindingOperationInfo somehow. On 9/15/06, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've raised a JIRA issue about wrapping informations [1]. > The wrapping informations for an operation is an effect of > the binding, not of the abstract operation. > All informations from the OperationInfo should be removed > and put in the BindingOperationInfo. > > It seems that actually the only information needed is wether > the bound operation is wrappable or not, which should be > a simple boolean on the BindingOperationInfo > > boolean isUnwrapped() > > The WSDLServiceFactory should be modified accordingly to > detect wrapped operation when the binding is built and > set this boolean flag if only one part is bound to the soap body. > Currently, it only check the number of parts in the message, > but fails to check if some of them are mapped to soap > headers. > > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-90 > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet